Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Claude 2.0 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Devstral Medium remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Claude 2.0

Anthropic

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Devstral Medium

Mistral

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 110.642tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude 2.0` vs `Devstral Medium`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium debate, Claude 2.0 scores 60 against Devstral Medium's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Claude 2.0300ms

Devstral Medium300ms

Tokens per Second

Claude 2.068

Devstral Medium110.642

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium

Power is only one part of the equation. This Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Claude 2.0 would cost $0.018, whereas Devstral Medium would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium Battle for You?

Choose Claude 2.0 if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Devstral Medium if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Claude 2.0 vs Devstral Medium Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/