Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Mistral Large (Feb '24) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Claude 2.0 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Claude 2.0

Anthropic

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Mistral Large (Feb '24)

Mistral

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.006
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude 2.0` vs `Mistral Large (Feb '24)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) debate, Claude 2.0 scores 60 against Mistral Large (Feb '24)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Claude 2.0300ms

Mistral Large (Feb '24)300ms

Tokens per Second

Claude 2.068

Mistral Large (Feb '24)61

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Claude 2.0 would cost $0.018, whereas Mistral Large (Feb '24) would cost $0.007. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) Battle for You?

Choose Claude 2.0 if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Mistral Large (Feb '24) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Claude 2.0 vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/