Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Grok Voice Agent emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)

Anthropic

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 5
Multimodal: 4
Long Context: 6
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.010
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 82.635tokens/sec

Grok Voice Agent

xAI

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 5
Long Context: 8
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)` vs `Grok Voice Agent`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent debate, Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) scores 90 against Grok Voice Agent's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)300ms

Grok Voice Agent300ms

Tokens per Second

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)82.635

Grok Voice Agent35

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent

Power is only one part of the equation. This Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) would cost $0.011, whereas Grok Voice Agent would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent Battle for You?

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Grok Voice Agent if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Grok Voice Agent Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/