AI Model ComparisonAI Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

Explore best-for scenariosLet the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
Anthropic
Reasoning
9
Coding
5
Multimodal
4
Long Context
6
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.010
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
85.308tokens/sec
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)
Other
Reasoning
6
Coding
1
Multimodal
2
Long Context
3
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.001
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
37.465tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)` vs `Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) debate, Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) scores 90 against Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)300ms
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)300ms
Tokens per Second
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)85.308
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)37.465
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) if...
Your top priority is raw performance and capability.
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) decision.
Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) if...
You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.
Your budget is a primary consideration in the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) choice.
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) Comparison | Performance, Pricing & Benchmarks