Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 7
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 5
Long Context: 8
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 73.343tokens/sec

Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker

Other

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 151.572tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)` vs `Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker debate, Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) scores 70 against Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker's 90. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)300ms

Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker300ms

Tokens per Second

Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)73.343

Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker151.572

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker

Power is only one part of the equation. This Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) would cost $0.002, whereas Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker Battle for You?

Choose Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/