DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Olmo 3.1 32B Think emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B

DeepSeek

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 101.587tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B` vs `Olmo 3.1 32B Think`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think debate, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B scores 60 against Olmo 3.1 32B Think's 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B300ms

Olmo 3.1 32B Think300ms

Tokens per Second

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B41

Olmo 3.1 32B Think101.587

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Power is only one part of the equation. This DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B would cost $0.018, whereas Olmo 3.1 32B Think would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think Battle for You?

Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Olmo 3.1 32B Think if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/