DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Llama 2 Chat 13B emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)

DeepSeek

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.002
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Llama 2 Chat 13B

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)` vs `Llama 2 Chat 13B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B debate, DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) scores 80 against Llama 2 Chat 13B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)300ms

Llama 2 Chat 13B300ms

Tokens per Second

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)25

Llama 2 Chat 13B61

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B

Power is only one part of the equation. This DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) would cost $0.002, whereas Llama 2 Chat 13B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B Battle for You?

Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Llama 2 Chat 13B if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Llama 2 Chat 13B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/