AI Model ComparisonAI Model Comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

Explore best-for scenariosLet the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)
DeepSeek
Reasoning
9
Coding
3
Multimodal
3
Long Context
4
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.001
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
—
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
Other
Reasoning
6
Coding
6
Multimodal
1
Long Context
2
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.000
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
32.649tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)` vs `Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B debate, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) scores 90 against Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)300ms
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B300ms
Tokens per Second
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)42
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B32.649
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B

Power is only one part of the equation. This DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B Battle for You?

Choose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) if...
Your top priority is raw performance and capability.
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
Cost is a secondary concern to power in your DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B decision.
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B if...
You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.
Your budget is a primary consideration in the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B choice.
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B Comparison | Performance, Pricing & Benchmarks