DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning)
DeepSeek
Reasoning
9
Coding
4
Multimodal
3
Long Context
5
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.000
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
31.585tokens/sec
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning)
Other
Reasoning
8
Coding
2
Multimodal
2
Long Context
2
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.000
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
75.33tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning)` vs `Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) debate, DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) scores 90 against Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning)'s 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning)300ms
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning)300ms
Tokens per Second
DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning)31.585
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning)75.33

The Economics of DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Which Model Wins the DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) if...
Your top priority is raw performance and capability.
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
Cost is a secondary concern to power in your DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) decision.
Choose Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) if...
You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.
Your budget is a primary consideration in the DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) choice.
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Your Questions about the DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) Comparison

DeepSeek V3.2 (Reasoning) vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) Comparison | Performance, Pricing & Benchmarks