DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs o1: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs o1 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, o1 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs o1 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)

DeepSeek

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 32.729tokens/sec

OpenAI

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.026
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 161.725tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs o1 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs o1 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)` vs `o1`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs o1 debate, DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) scores 60 against o1's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs o1 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs o1 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)300ms

o1300ms

Tokens per Second

DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)32.729

o1161.725

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs o1

Power is only one part of the equation. This DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs o1 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) would cost $0.000, whereas o1 would cost $0.030. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs o1 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy