ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B : The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, **Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed **ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Other

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 27.971tokens/sec

Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the **ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our **ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B` vs `Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B `.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the **ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** debate, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B scores 40 against Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B 's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious **ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the **ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B300ms

Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B 300ms

Tokens per Second

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B27.971

Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B 28

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B

Power is only one part of the equation. This **ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B would cost $0.001, whereas Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the **ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B Battle for You?

Choose ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/