Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Qwen2.5 Max emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 5
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Qwen2.5 Max

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 38.764tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)` vs `Qwen2.5 Max`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max debate, Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) scores 50 against Qwen2.5 Max's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)300ms

Qwen2.5 Max300ms

Tokens per Second

Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)28

Qwen2.5 Max38.764

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max

Power is only one part of the equation. This Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) would cost $0.018, whereas Qwen2.5 Max would cost $0.003. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max Battle for You?

Choose Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Qwen2.5 Max if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/