EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Claude 3.5 Haiku remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 100.591tokens/sec

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.002
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 47.597tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)` vs `Claude 3.5 Haiku`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku debate, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) scores 80 against Claude 3.5 Haiku's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)300ms

Claude 3.5 Haiku300ms

Tokens per Second

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)100.591

Claude 3.5 Haiku47.597

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Power is only one part of the equation. This EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) would cost $0.001, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku would cost $0.002. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku Battle for You?

Choose EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/