EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, GPT-3.5 Turbo remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 95.654tokens/sec

GPT-3.5 Turbo

OpenAI

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 100.48tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)` vs `GPT-3.5 Turbo`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo debate, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) scores 80 against GPT-3.5 Turbo's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)300ms

GPT-3.5 Turbo300ms

Tokens per Second

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)95.654

GPT-3.5 Turbo100.48

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo

Power is only one part of the equation. This EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) would cost $0.001, whereas GPT-3.5 Turbo would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Battle for You?

Choose EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/