EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Mistral Medium emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 88.203tokens/sec

Mistral Medium

Mistral

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.004
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 94.005tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)` vs `Mistral Medium`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium debate, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) scores 40 against Mistral Medium's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)300ms

Mistral Medium300ms

Tokens per Second

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)88.203

Mistral Medium94.005

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium

Power is only one part of the equation. This EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) would cost $0.001, whereas Mistral Medium would cost $0.005. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium Battle for You?

Choose EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Mistral Medium if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/