Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Claude 3.5 Haiku remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25)

Google

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 5
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.002
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 47.597tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25)` vs `Claude 3.5 Haiku`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku debate, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) scores 60 against Claude 3.5 Haiku's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25)300ms

Claude 3.5 Haiku300ms

Tokens per Second

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25)56

Claude 3.5 Haiku47.597

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Power is only one part of the equation. This Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) would cost $0.018, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku would cost $0.002. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku Battle for You?

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Mar' 25) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/