Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Gemini 2.5 Pro emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 152.799tokens/sec

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 98.899tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemini 2.5 Pro` vs `EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) debate, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 90 against EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)'s 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Gemini 2.5 Pro300ms

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

Gemini 2.5 Pro152.799

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)98.899

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Gemini 2.5 Pro would cost $0.004, whereas EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) decision.

Choose EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/