Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)

Google

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 4
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 170.659tokens/sec

LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)` vs `LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct debate, Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) scores 60 against LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)300ms

LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct300ms

Tokens per Second

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)170.659

LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct62

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct

Power is only one part of the equation. This Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) would cost $0.001, whereas LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct Battle for You?

Choose Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/