Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B : The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, **Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Gemma 3 27B Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed **Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemma 3 27B Instruct

Google

Reasoning: 2
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 36.022tokens/sec

Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the **Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our **Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemma 3 27B Instruct` vs `Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B `.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the **Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** debate, Gemma 3 27B Instruct scores 20 against Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B 's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious **Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the **Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Gemma 3 27B Instruct300ms

Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B 300ms

Tokens per Second

Gemma 3 27B Instruct36.022

Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B 28

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B

Power is only one part of the equation. This **Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Gemma 3 27B Instruct would cost $0.018, whereas Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the **Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B Battle for You?

Choose Gemma 3 27B Instruct if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/