GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 (low): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 (low) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, GPT-5 (low) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 (low) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 3
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 60.431tokens/sec

GPT-5 (low)

OpenAI

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 107.857tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 (low) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 (low) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)` vs `GPT-5 (low)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 (low) debate, GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) scores 30 against GPT-5 (low)'s 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 (low) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 (low) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)300ms

GPT-5 (low)300ms

Tokens per Second

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)60.431

GPT-5 (low)107.857

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 (low)

Power is only one part of the equation. This GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 (low) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) would cost $0.001, whereas GPT-5 (low) would cost $0.004. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 (low) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy