GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, GPT-3.5 Turbo emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Magistral Small 1 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

GPT-3.5 Turbo

OpenAI

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 100.48tokens/sec

Magistral Small 1

Mistral

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 193.575tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `GPT-3.5 Turbo` vs `Magistral Small 1`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1 debate, GPT-3.5 Turbo scores 60 against Magistral Small 1's 40. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

GPT-3.5 Turbo300ms

Magistral Small 1300ms

Tokens per Second

GPT-3.5 Turbo100.48

Magistral Small 1193.575

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1

Power is only one part of the equation. This GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo would cost $0.001, whereas Magistral Small 1 would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1 Battle for You?

Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Magistral Small 1 if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Small 1 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/