GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, GPT-5 nano (high) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Mistral Medium 3.1 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

GPT-5 nano (high)

OpenAI

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 120.003tokens/sec

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 92.492tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `GPT-5 nano (high)` vs `Mistral Medium 3.1`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1 debate, GPT-5 nano (high) scores 80 against Mistral Medium 3.1's 40. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

GPT-5 nano (high)300ms

Mistral Medium 3.1300ms

Tokens per Second

GPT-5 nano (high)120.003

Mistral Medium 3.192.492

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Power is only one part of the equation. This GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, GPT-5 nano (high) would cost $0.000, whereas Mistral Medium 3.1 would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1 Battle for You?

Choose GPT-5 nano (high) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the GPT-5 nano (high) vs Mistral Medium 3.1 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/