Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, QwQ 32B-Preview remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)

xAI

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 182.829tokens/sec

QwQ 32B-Preview

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 41.925tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)` vs `QwQ 32B-Preview`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview debate, Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) scores 90 against QwQ 32B-Preview's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)300ms

QwQ 32B-Preview300ms

Tokens per Second

Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)182.829

QwQ 32B-Preview41.925

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview

Power is only one part of the equation. This Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) would cost $0.000, whereas QwQ 32B-Preview would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview Battle for You?

Choose Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview decision.

Choose QwQ 32B-Preview if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs QwQ 32B-Preview Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/