Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Mistral Medium 3 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning)

xAI

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 4
Multimodal: 4
Long Context: 6
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 246.896tokens/sec

Mistral Medium 3

Mistral

Reasoning: 3
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 52.519tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning)` vs `Mistral Medium 3`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 debate, Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) scores 60 against Mistral Medium 3's 30. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning)300ms

Mistral Medium 3300ms

Tokens per Second

Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning)246.896

Mistral Medium 352.519

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3

Power is only one part of the equation. This Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) would cost $0.004, whereas Mistral Medium 3 would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 Battle for You?

Choose Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Mistral Medium 3 if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts