Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Grok 4 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Grok 4

xAI

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 4
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.006
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 41.735tokens/sec

Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 4
Multimodal: 4
Long Context: 6
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 88.504tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Grok 4` vs `Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) debate, Grok 4 scores 90 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Grok 4300ms

Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

Grok 441.735

Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)88.504

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Grok 4 would cost $0.007, whereas Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) would cost $0.002. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Grok 4 if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) decision.

Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts