Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Pixtral Large emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Jamba 1.7 Large remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Jamba 1.7 Large

Other

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.004
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 40.854tokens/sec

Pixtral Large

Mistral

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 50.892tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Jamba 1.7 Large` vs `Pixtral Large`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large debate, Jamba 1.7 Large scores 10 against Pixtral Large's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Jamba 1.7 Large300ms

Pixtral Large300ms

Tokens per Second

Jamba 1.7 Large40.854

Pixtral Large50.892

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large

Power is only one part of the equation. This Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Jamba 1.7 Large would cost $0.004, whereas Pixtral Large would cost $0.004. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large Battle for You?

Choose Jamba 1.7 Large if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Pixtral Large if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Jamba 1.7 Large vs Pixtral Large Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/