LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison
Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.
The Final Verdict in the LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta Showdown
Model Snapshot
Key decision metrics at a glance.
- Reasoning
- 1
- Coding
- 1
- Multimodal
- 1
- Long Context
- 1
- Blended Price / 1M tokens
- $0.015
- P95 Latency
- 1000ms
- Tokens per second
- —
- Reasoning
- 6
- Coding
- 6
- Multimodal
- 1
- Long Context
- 2
- Blended Price / 1M tokens
- $0.015
- P95 Latency
- 1000ms
- Tokens per second
- —
Overall Capabilities
The capability radar provides a holistic view of the LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta analysis.
Benchmark Breakdown
For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta debate, LFM2 2.6B scores 10 against Grok Beta's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta comparison.
Speed & Latency
Speed is a crucial factor in the LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.
The Economics of LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta
Power is only one part of the equation. This LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.
Real-World Cost Scenario
LFM2 2.6B would cost $0.018, whereas Grok Beta would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta choice.Which Model Wins the LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta Battle for You?
Your Questions about the LFM2 2.6B vs Grok Beta Comparison
Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/
