Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Gemma 3n E2B Instruct emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B` vs `Gemma 3n E2B Instruct`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct debate, Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B scores 10 against Gemma 3n E2B Instruct's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B300ms

Gemma 3n E2B Instruct300ms

Tokens per Second

Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B24.823

Gemma 3n E2B Instruct34.646

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct

Power is only one part of the equation. This Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B would cost $0.005, whereas Gemma 3n E2B Instruct would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct Battle for You?

Choose Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instruct if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/