Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, GPT-5 mini (medium) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B

Other

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 39.095tokens/sec

GPT-5 mini (medium)

OpenAI

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 74.105tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B` vs `GPT-5 mini (medium)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium) debate, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B scores 10 against GPT-5 mini (medium)'s 90. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B300ms

GPT-5 mini (medium)300ms

Tokens per Second

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B39.095

GPT-5 mini (medium)74.105

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B would cost $0.001, whereas GPT-5 mini (medium) would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium) Battle for You?

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose GPT-5 mini (medium) if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B vs GPT-5 mini (medium) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/