Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 5
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)

Google

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 291.224tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)` vs `Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) debate, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) scores 50 against Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)'s 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)300ms

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)54

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)291.224

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) would cost $0.018, whereas Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/