AI Model ComparisonAI Model Comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

Explore best-for scenariosLet the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)
Other
Reasoning
5
Coding
6
Multimodal
1
Long Context
2
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.015
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
—
Kimi K2 Thinking
Other
Reasoning
9
Coding
3
Multimodal
3
Long Context
5
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.001
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
97.929tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)` vs `Kimi K2 Thinking`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking debate, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) scores 50 against Kimi K2 Thinking's 90. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)300ms
Kimi K2 Thinking300ms
Tokens per Second
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)54
Kimi K2 Thinking97.929
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Power is only one part of the equation. This Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking Battle for You?

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) if...
Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking decision.
You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.
Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.
Choose Kimi K2 Thinking if...
You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.
Your budget is a primary consideration in the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking choice.
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2 Thinking Comparison | Performance, Pricing & Benchmarks