Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)
Other
Reasoning
6
Coding
1
Multimodal
2
Long Context
3
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.001
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
37.465tokens/sec
Qwen3 4B (Reasoning)
Other
Reasoning
2
Coding
6
Multimodal
1
Long Context
2
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.000
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
90.047tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)` vs `Qwen3 4B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) debate, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) scores 60 against Qwen3 4B (Reasoning)'s 20. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)300ms
Qwen3 4B (Reasoning)300ms
Tokens per Second
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)37.465
Qwen3 4B (Reasoning)90.047

The Economics of Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Which Model Wins the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) if...
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) decision.
You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.
Choose Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) if...
You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.
Your budget is a primary consideration in the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) choice.
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Your Questions about the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) Comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) Comparison | Performance, Pricing & Benchmarks