Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Qwen2.5 Turbo emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision)

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision)` vs `Qwen2.5 Turbo`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo debate, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) scores 60 against Qwen2.5 Turbo's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision)300ms

Qwen2.5 Turbo300ms

Tokens per Second

Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision)35.236

Qwen2.5 Turbo69.084

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo

Power is only one part of the equation. This Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) would cost $0.001, whereas Qwen2.5 Turbo would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo Battle for You?

Choose Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Qwen2.5 Turbo if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) vs Qwen2.5 Turbo Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/