AI Model ComparisonAI Model Comparison

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B : The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

Explore best-for scenariosLet the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning)
Other
Reasoning
5
Coding
1
Multimodal
2
Long Context
2
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.015
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
—
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B
Other
Reasoning
6
Coding
6
Multimodal
1
Long Context
1
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.015
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
—

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the **Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our **Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning)` vs `Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B `.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the **Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** debate, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) scores 50 against Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B 's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious **Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the **Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning)300ms
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B 300ms
Tokens per Second
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning)34
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B 28
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B

Power is only one part of the equation. This **Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B ** pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B Battle for You?

Choose Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) if...
You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.
Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B if...
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.
Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 7B Comparison | Performance, Pricing & Benchmarks