Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Mistral Small 3.2 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Llama 4 Maverick remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Llama 4 Maverick

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Llama 4 Maverick` vs `Mistral Small 3.2`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 debate, Llama 4 Maverick scores 20 against Mistral Small 3.2's 30. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Llama 4 Maverick300ms

Mistral Small 3.2300ms

Tokens per Second

Llama 4 Maverick129.83

Mistral Small 3.2126.321

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2

Power is only one part of the equation. This Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Llama 4 Maverick would cost $0.001, whereas Mistral Small 3.2 would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 Battle for You?

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Mistral Small 3.2 if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/