Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Qwen3 Max Thinking emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Llama 65B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Llama 65B

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Llama 65B` vs `Qwen3 Max Thinking`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking debate, Llama 65B scores 60 against Qwen3 Max Thinking's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Llama 65B300ms

Qwen3 Max Thinking300ms

Tokens per Second

Llama 65B54

Qwen3 Max Thinking39.021

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

Power is only one part of the equation. This Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Llama 65B would cost $0.018, whereas Qwen3 Max Thinking would cost $0.003. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking Battle for You?

Choose Llama 65B if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Qwen3 Max Thinking if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 Max Thinking Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/