Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Magistral Medium 1.2 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Magistral Medium 1.2

Mistral

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 40.128tokens/sec

DeepSeek-Coder-V2

DeepSeek

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Magistral Medium 1.2` vs `DeepSeek-Coder-V2`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 debate, Magistral Medium 1.2 scores 80 against DeepSeek-Coder-V2's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Magistral Medium 1.2300ms

DeepSeek-Coder-V2300ms

Tokens per Second

Magistral Medium 1.240.128

DeepSeek-Coder-V269

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2

Power is only one part of the equation. This Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Magistral Medium 1.2 would cost $0.003, whereas DeepSeek-Coder-V2 would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Battle for You?

Choose Magistral Medium 1.2 if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose DeepSeek-Coder-V2 if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/