Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison
Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.
The Final Verdict in the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max Showdown
Model Snapshot
Key decision metrics at a glance.
- Reasoning
- 8
- Coding
- 2
- Multimodal
- 2
- Long Context
- 3
- Blended Price / 1M tokens
- $0.003
- P95 Latency
- 1000ms
- Tokens per second
- 31.19tokens/sec
- Reasoning
- 8
- Coding
- 3
- Multimodal
- 3
- Long Context
- 4
- Blended Price / 1M tokens
- $0.002
- P95 Latency
- 1000ms
- Tokens per second
- 30.519tokens/sec
Overall Capabilities
The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max analysis.
Benchmark Breakdown
For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max debate, Magistral Medium 1.2 scores 80 against Qwen3 Max's 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max comparison.
Speed & Latency
Speed is a crucial factor in the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.
The Economics of Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max
Power is only one part of the equation. This Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.
Real-World Cost Scenario
Magistral Medium 1.2 would cost $0.003, whereas Qwen3 Max would cost $0.003. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max choice.Which Model Wins the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max Battle for You?
Your Questions about the Magistral Medium 1.2 vs Qwen3 Max Comparison
Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/