Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Magistral Small 1.2 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Granite 4.0 H Small remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Magistral Small 1.2

Mistral

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 182.755tokens/sec

Granite 4.0 H Small

Other

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 428.24tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Magistral Small 1.2` vs `Granite 4.0 H Small`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small debate, Magistral Small 1.2 scores 80 against Granite 4.0 H Small's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Magistral Small 1.2300ms

Granite 4.0 H Small300ms

Tokens per Second

Magistral Small 1.2182.755

Granite 4.0 H Small428.24

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small

Power is only one part of the equation. This Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Magistral Small 1.2 would cost $0.001, whereas Granite 4.0 H Small would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small Battle for You?

Choose Magistral Small 1.2 if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small decision.

Choose Granite 4.0 H Small if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/