Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Medium 1.2: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Magistral Medium 1.2 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Mistral Medium 3.1 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 92.492tokens/sec

Magistral Medium 1.2

Mistral

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 34.469tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Mistral Medium 3.1` vs `Magistral Medium 1.2`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 debate, Mistral Medium 3.1 scores 40 against Magistral Medium 1.2's 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Mistral Medium 3.1300ms

Magistral Medium 1.2300ms

Tokens per Second

Mistral Medium 3.192.492

Magistral Medium 1.234.469

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Medium 1.2

Power is only one part of the equation. This Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 would cost $0.001, whereas Magistral Medium 1.2 would cost $0.003. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy