Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Saba: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Saba Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Mistral Saba emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Mistral Medium 3.1 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Saba comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 92.746tokens/sec

Mistral Saba

Mistral

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Saba matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Saba analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Mistral Medium 3.1` vs `Mistral Saba`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Saba debate, Mistral Medium 3.1 scores 40 against Mistral Saba's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Saba comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Saba decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Mistral Medium 3.1300ms

Mistral Saba300ms

Tokens per Second

Mistral Medium 3.192.746

Mistral Saba46

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Saba

Power is only one part of the equation. This Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Saba pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 would cost $0.001, whereas Mistral Saba would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Saba choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy