Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen Chat 14B: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen Chat 14B Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Qwen Chat 14B emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Mistral Medium 3.1 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen Chat 14B comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 99.973tokens/sec

Qwen Chat 14B

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen Chat 14B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen Chat 14B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Mistral Medium 3.1` vs `Qwen Chat 14B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen Chat 14B debate, Mistral Medium 3.1 scores 40 against Qwen Chat 14B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen Chat 14B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen Chat 14B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Mistral Medium 3.1300ms

Qwen Chat 14B300ms

Tokens per Second

Mistral Medium 3.199.973

Qwen Chat 14B46

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen Chat 14B

Power is only one part of the equation. This Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen Chat 14B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 would cost $0.001, whereas Qwen Chat 14B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen Chat 14B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy