Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Mistral Small (Feb '24) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Magistral Small 1 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Mistral Small (Feb '24)

Mistral

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.002
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 119.688tokens/sec

Magistral Small 1

Mistral

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 206.644tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Mistral Small (Feb '24)` vs `Magistral Small 1`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 debate, Mistral Small (Feb '24) scores 60 against Magistral Small 1's 40. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Mistral Small (Feb '24)300ms

Magistral Small 1300ms

Tokens per Second

Mistral Small (Feb '24)119.688

Magistral Small 1206.644

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1

Power is only one part of the equation. This Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Mistral Small (Feb '24) would cost $0.002, whereas Magistral Small 1 would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 Battle for You?

Choose Mistral Small (Feb '24) if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Magistral Small 1 if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Magistral Small 1 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/