Mistral Small 3.2 vs Magistral Medium 1.2: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Mistral Small 3.2 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Magistral Medium 1.2 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Mistral Small 3.2 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Mistral Small 3.2 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Mistral Small 3.2

Mistral

Reasoning: 3
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 112.546tokens/sec

Magistral Medium 1.2

Mistral

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 38.002tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Mistral Small 3.2 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Mistral Small 3.2 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Mistral Small 3.2` vs `Magistral Medium 1.2`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Mistral Small 3.2 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 debate, Mistral Small 3.2 scores 30 against Magistral Medium 1.2's 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Mistral Small 3.2 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Mistral Small 3.2 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Mistral Small 3.2300ms

Magistral Medium 1.2300ms

Tokens per Second

Mistral Small 3.2112.546

Magistral Medium 1.238.002

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Mistral Small 3.2 vs Magistral Medium 1.2

Power is only one part of the equation. This Mistral Small 3.2 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Mistral Small 3.2 would cost $0.000, whereas Magistral Medium 1.2 would cost $0.003. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Mistral Small 3.2 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy