Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, OpenChat 3.5 (1210) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Mixtral 8x7B Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Mixtral 8x7B Instruct

Mistral

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

OpenChat 3.5 (1210)

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Mixtral 8x7B Instruct` vs `OpenChat 3.5 (1210)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) debate, Mixtral 8x7B Instruct scores 60 against OpenChat 3.5 (1210)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Mixtral 8x7B Instruct300ms

OpenChat 3.5 (1210)300ms

Tokens per Second

Mixtral 8x7B Instruct24

OpenChat 3.5 (1210)41

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Mixtral 8x7B Instruct would cost $0.001, whereas OpenChat 3.5 (1210) would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) Battle for You?

Choose Mixtral 8x7B Instruct if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose OpenChat 3.5 (1210) if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Mixtral 8x7B Instruct vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/