Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, GPT-5 nano (medium) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

GPT-5 nano (medium)

OpenAI

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 122.049tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning` vs `GPT-5 nano (medium)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) debate, Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning scores 80 against GPT-5 nano (medium)'s 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning300ms

GPT-5 nano (medium)300ms

Tokens per Second

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning60

GPT-5 nano (medium)122.049

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning would cost $0.018, whereas GPT-5 nano (medium) would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) Battle for You?

Choose Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose GPT-5 nano (medium) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning vs GPT-5 nano (medium) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/