o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, o3 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

OpenAI

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 4
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.004
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 232.57tokens/sec

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 5
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `o3` vs `Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) debate, o3 scores 90 against Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)'s 50. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

o3300ms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

o3232.57

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)54

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, o3 would cost $0.004, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose o3 if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the o3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/