Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Qwen2.5 Turbo emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 32.649tokens/sec

Qwen2.5 Turbo

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 69.199tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B` vs `Qwen2.5 Turbo`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo debate, Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B scores 60 against Qwen2.5 Turbo's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B300ms

Qwen2.5 Turbo300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B32.649

Qwen2.5 Turbo69.199

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B would cost $0.000, whereas Qwen2.5 Turbo would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo Battle for You?

Choose Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Qwen2.5 Turbo if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B vs Qwen2.5 Turbo Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/