Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Reka Flash (Sep '24) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 3
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Reka Flash (Sep '24)

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 68.884tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)` vs `Reka Flash (Sep '24)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) debate, Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) scores 30 against Reka Flash (Sep '24)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)300ms

Reka Flash (Sep '24)300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)20

Reka Flash (Sep '24)68.884

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) would cost $0.018, whereas Reka Flash (Sep '24) would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) Battle for You?

Choose Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Reka Flash (Sep '24) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/