R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Reka Flash (Sep '24) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, R1 1776 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

R1 1776

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Reka Flash (Sep '24)

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 68.884tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `R1 1776` vs `Reka Flash (Sep '24)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) debate, R1 1776 scores 60 against Reka Flash (Sep '24)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

R1 1776300ms

Reka Flash (Sep '24)300ms

Tokens per Second

R1 177631

Reka Flash (Sep '24)68.884

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24)

Power is only one part of the equation. This R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, R1 1776 would cost $0.018, whereas Reka Flash (Sep '24) would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) Battle for You?

Choose R1 1776 if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Reka Flash (Sep '24) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the R1 1776 vs Reka Flash (Sep '24) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/